The Wuhan Institute of Virology was selected as the finalist for the award for “Outstanding Science and Technology Achievements”.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology was selected as the final candidate for the award for “outstanding science and technology achievements” for “identifying” the coronavirus.
The Academy of Sciences (CAS) of China announced a list of candidates for the 2021 award on Friday, with lab director Shi Zhengli, the “woman of bats,” and deputy director Shi Zhengli nominated as outstanding contributors. I did.
Dr. Shi was praised for “identifying the Covid-19 pathogen and completing other studies on coronavirus sequencing, virus isolation, receptor validation, mouse model establishment, and pathogen identification.”
Dr. Yaun was selected for “Outstanding Contribution to Establishing a Model of Non-Human Primate Infection with Coronavirus”.
Scientists in Wuhan’s lab say “slandering”
State-owned Global Times The outlet wrote that the Wuhan Institute of Virginology and its scientists were nominated for the award, citing growing speculation that they were “attacked by new slander from Western politicians and the media.” The virus was created in the lab..
Dr. City, with rare public comments New York Times Last week, he was angry at the claim.
“How can I provide evidence of something that has no evidence?” She said, Add a text message“I don’t know how the world reached this, or constantly pouring filth on innocent scientists.”
Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, told reporters Thursday that the Wuhan team “should win the Nobel Prize in Medicine for Covid-19 research, not criticism.”
Award for “Identification of Covid-19”
According to CAS, the Wuhan Virology Institute “quickly identifies pathogens after the outbreak of Covid-19, completes viral genome sequencing and virus isolation in a short period of time, and the Covid-19 virus is the same functional receptor. As a SARS virus, we systematically analyzed the basic biological properties of the virus and the coronavirus carried by the bat could be the evolutionary ancestor of the Covid-19 coronavirus. Revealed that there is sex. Global Times I have written.
Lab scientists said, “By using human ACE2 (angiotensin converting enzyme 2) transgenic mice and red-throated monkeys, Covid- by simulating the symptoms and pathological changes of humans infected with Covid-19. An animal model of 19 infections has also been established. “
“In addition, the research group has established various coronavirus serological tests, established nucleic acid detection techniques and applied them to the detection of clinical samples, which open up multiple routes of coronavirus transmission, including fecal infections. It became clear. ” Global Times The report continued.
“The research group has completed Covid-19’s most comprehensive and systematic pathogenicity identification study, which includes coronavirus origin, epidemiology, pathogenic mechanism tracking, and research and CAS, drugs and vaccines. It states that it provided important scientific and technical support for the development of, and the prevention and management of epidemiology.
Lab leak case “overwhelming”
This news is that the virus Designed by Chinese scientists Through so-called “feature acquisition” research that attempts to supercharge pathogens through genetic engineering.
Labrique theory was widely dismissed as a conspiracy theory after being endorsed by former President Donald Trump and his administration last year.
“At the time, people didn’t want to publicly seek an investigation into the origin of the laboratory because it was scared to be a tool for racists because it had something to do with Trump,” said 18 scientists. Alina Chan, one of the journal’s recent letters Science call For more detailed investigation He told NBC last week about the origin of the virus.
A World Health Organization study on the origin of Covid-19 concluded in February that the virus was “very unlikely” to come from the laboratory.
However, due to doubts about the quality of the findings, the U.S. government last month instructed intelligence agencies to conduct a new 90-day investigation, and U.S. President Joe Biden and other world leaders called for further investigation. It was.
Last week, two top US scientists said there was “overwhelming” evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, was created at the Wuhan Institute of Veterinary Medicine.
“Before the pandemic, Covid-19 wasn’t smoldering in the community, as observed in previous coronavirus epidemics,” said Dr. Stephen Key, a conference hosted by the Hudson Institute based in Washington, DC. Said in.
In his presentation, Dr. Key Said important evidence Lab leaks were pointed out that when the virus first appeared, it was already highly contagious, unlike other viruses that could be observed to evolve as they spread throughout the population until the most contagious form became predominant. It was the fact that it was sex.
Based on a comparison with the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS epidemics, Dr. Quay said that the probability that “community-acquired zoonotic diseases” would produce the results seen in the early epidemics of SARS-CoV-2. It’s literally one millionth. ” ..
“Dumming” gene fingerprint
Last month, Dr. Key and Professor Richard Muller, astrophysicists at the University of California, Berkeley, gave a scientific case study of Labrique theory. The Wall Street Journal, SARS-CoV-2’s “genetic fingerprint” describes it as the most horrifying sign created in the lab.
They pointed to a specific amino acid sequence known as CGG-CGG or double CGG. It is commonly conjugated to the virus by researchers to increase lethality.
“In fact, the CGG-CGG combination has never been found naturally across a class of coronaviruses, including CoV-2,” they write.
“Now, a terrible fact. It was this exact sequence that appeared in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic diseases happen to be the most disliked combination of new coronaviruses when they are mutated or recombined. I need to explain why I chose Double CGG. Why did it recreate the choices that lab feature acquisition researchers would have made? “
Australian scientists remain skeptical
However, Professor Dominique Dwyer, director of public health pathology in New South Wales, who was one of the 17 international experts on the WHO team in January, is skeptical of Labreak theory.
“The lab leak is there, but we need some proof to go further,” he said. Sydney Morning Herald this month.
Professor Dwyer said that the main flaw in this hypothesis was that there was no evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had the SARS-CoV-2 virus before the pandemic, and it is unlikely that it had the virus. He said he did not publish a paper on it. ..
“They are pretty well-known research institutes,” he said.
“They have published a lot of very good treatises and are working with people all over the world. Even if they had it, there was no reason to hide it from a scientific or intellectual point of view.”
He spoke with SBS last week and reasserted that animal-to-human transmission was the most likely source and “a true process of trial and error.”
“To date, many other viruses have followed this path, including the original coronaviruses that infect humans, such as SARS and MERS,” he said.
“Almost all human viruses identified in the last 40 or 50 years are somehow derived from animals and are primarily due to bats, so there is history and it is well documented. I am. “
Wuhan Institute of Virology short-listed for Covid-19 science prize Source link Wuhan Institute of Virology short-listed for Covid-19 science prize