Why Joe Biden Should Trade His Buildings Plan for a Green New Deal

In the United States, the building and construction industry accounts for 35% of total emissions, so it is clear that no decarbonization program can ignore them. As a result, Joe Biden’s climate plan has a large commitment that “all U.S. government facilities, buildings and facilities will be more efficient and climate responsive, leveraging purchasing power and supply chains to drive innovation.” It contains.

However, the new report suggests that the plan will not reach Biden’s own goals. According to a report released Tuesday by Colorado-based energy efficiency research organization Carbon Switch, Biden’s plans could reduce carbon emissions by US $ 17.6 billion by 2050. However, it is far superior to the emission reduction plan for buildings without Trump. That’s not enough yet.

An important promise of Biden’s climate plan is to weather 2 million homes. The carbon switch connected that pledge to a model created by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. This model shows what emission savings can be achieved by changing homes in the United States.

“I saw what that commitment really does, and I found it to be less effective than what we need,” wrote the report’s founder of Carbon Switch. Said the lead investigator, Michael Thomas.

Biden often says he is committed to the Paris Climate Agreement. However, according to the Regulatory Assistance Project, the efficiency of all housing in the United States between now and 2050 to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement and limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit). Should be improved by 50%. This means weathering 2.6 million homes annually over the next 30 years. Biden’s promise to weather two million people in four years of presidency will fulfill just a few. The climate platform includes a commitment to “reduce carbon dioxide emissions from US building stock to 50% by 2035.”

It also fails to meet the campaign’s unique goal of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from US building stock by 50% by 2035. Using the NREL model, Thomas found that 5 million homes needed to be 50% more efficient each year to reach that goal. This is ten times the number of annual weather resistances the plan promises.

Even the imperfect promise of Biden to weather two million homes in four years is not easy to achieve, as Congress needs to support and fund it. But if he did, the report found that by 2050, the cumulative emissions of US ton 183 million buildings could be reduced.

Biden is working on other building-related goals that also require parliamentary support. Biden, for example, wants the United States to sign an international agreement to reduce emissions in the refrigerant and cooling sectors. According to Thomas’ calculations, doing so could reduce cumulative emissions of US $ 10.5 billion by 2050, but would require ratification by the Senate.

Other building-related emission reductions can be achieved without executive order and Congressional support from the Department of Energy. This includes the introduction of new appliance efficiency and lighting efficiency standards that can reduce emissions by 3.5 billion metric tonnes and 1.9 billion US tonnes, respectively. However, the report states that even these policies could face legal issues from industry representatives and if the Trump administration succeeds in appointing another conservative judge to the Supreme Court. , States that those issues can be heard in courts that are unfriendly and supportive of the business.

To promote these climate policies in the current political climate, Biden needs extensive support at Capitol Hill. But if it’s the support Biden wants, you might want to adopt a bold plan like the Green New Deal. This includes the goal of weathering 8 million homes annually for 10 years. It will affect all homes in the United States by 2030. Adopting a more ambitious policy platform will make more homes more energy efficient and lower energy prices for Americans. According to the analysis, Biden’s weathering program creates 109,860 jobs, while the Green New Deal creates 10 million.

“The plan has no imagination and ambition, so it can only swing between despair and frustration,” said Billy Fleming, director of the McHague Center at the University of Pennsylvania’s Graduate School of Design at Weitzman, not working on the report. was. Said. “Sure, take care of the hanging fruits that President Clinton and President Obama left for you regarding climate change. Next, consider raising the grasp 1-2 inches higher for us. please.”

Thomas says Biden was likely to have limited the scope of his plans to enjoy the support of both parties.

“This is a bipartisan approach, trying to suggest what they think they will actually pass through,” he said, but also said the Green New Deal could be much more effective. “I think we need to think about this investment, which can create the best economic opportunities in history.”

This is especially true now because of the economic instability and unemployment crisis that the United States saw in covid-19. It also put a financial crisis and put people at risk of shutting down their utilities. A more aggressive stimulus and weather resistance approach can help both unemployment and reduce the burden of utility bills.

Why Joe Biden Should Trade His Buildings Plan for a Green New Deal Source link Why Joe Biden Should Trade His Buildings Plan for a Green New Deal

Back to top button