China used the Jingoist state media to blame the historic defense agreement between Australia and Japan and said it was “unavoidable” to take any countermeasures.
A defense agreement, called the Mutual Access Agreement, was “in principle” agreed during Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s visit to Japan, but has not yet been formally signed.
The agreement will pave the way for Australian and Japanese troops to access each other’s bases and deepen cooperation between the two countries.
However, we are still facing fine-tuning as to whether Australians may be subject to the death penalty in Japan.
Although the Chinese government has not officially responded to this agreement, using informal media of nationalism, Japan and Australia have “safety to act on China, its largest trading partner, at their request.” It gives a bad example by interpreting it as a “security threat.” We “.
Editorial Global Times Published only in English for a foreign audience, it assembled the two countries as a pawn in the United States.
“China is unlikely to remain indifferent to the US move to incite countries to oppose China in the long run,” he said.
“It is inevitable that China will take some measures.
“Countries like Japan and Australia have been used as tools in the United States. The strategic risk of tool damage is certainly higher than the risk of users.”
Media in several other states have reached an agreement as a historical contradiction, pointing out that Japan is the only country to bomb Australia.
“This deal can be described as a paramilitary agreement,” said Professor Yinhong Shi of Renmin University of China.
“It is not a promise to support the other country in the event of an attack, but it is an agreement to deploy your own army in the other country for joint exercises.
“This is a very important step in establishing an Indo-Pacific alliance with China.”
Federal Trade Minister Simon Birmingham argues that the defense agreement has nothing to do with the sour relationship between Australia and China, resulting in Beijing’s informal trade ban or restriction on Australia’s annual exports of about $ 6 billion. Was imposed.
“This has nothing to do with that. Japan and Australia are countries that share common values and a commitment to the principles of democracy, and we would like to work together. It’s not surprising, “he said.
China’s Commerce Minister Zhongshan refused to talk to Senator Birmingham about China’s trade strike on Australia’s exports for more than six months, but previously Australia had multiple world trades on various Chinese exports. It was publicly linked to initiating or participating in an institution’s anti-dumping lawsuit.
In recent weeks, Beijing has increasingly revealed that Australia is hoping to make a diplomatic overture to heal relations.
A Foreign Ministry spokesman reiterated on Tuesday that China “is not responsible at all” for worsening relations.
In response to a question asked by the Chinese government media, spokesman Zhao Lijian identified Australia’s public comments on Hong Kong, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and Taiwan as issues and used anti-interference to “scratch” China. Identified the law.
He also cited Australia’s block of 5G networks Huawei and various Chinese investments for “national security” as examples of Australia’s breach of relations.
He further stated that Australia had joined the call for an independent investigation into the coronavirus pandemic that originated in Wuhan and spread from Wuhan.
Concerns about the death penalty
The text of the defense agreement has not yet been published, so the Legal Council has expressed concern that it could expose Australians to the death penalty in Japan.
In the last six years of negotiations, it has been a major issue to ensure that Australian troops who have committed serious crimes in Japan do not face the death penalty.
After World War II, criminal cases such as murder, rape, and assault by the US military stationed in Okinawa are prominent, so the criminal issues of foreign troops are politically sensitive in Japan.
“If something happens while the Australian army is on Japanese territory, the agreement seeks assurance that the Australian army will be adequately protected from the death penalty,” said Pauline Wright, chairman of the Legal Council.
Australian warned of China ‘countermeasures’ over Japan pact Source link Australian warned of China ‘countermeasures’ over Japan pact